#Secrets of grindea updates password

Nosal I held that the CFAA was an “anti-hacking” statute and did not contemplate, nor criminalize, the misappropriation of trade secrets.

#Secrets of grindea updates password

Such a focus makes sense given that the interpretation of this short phrase could completely change the legal landscape surrounding password sharing, not only in professional settings, but also in personal, consensual settings.Ĭounsel for Nosal urged the panel to adopt a limited reading of the CFAA, based on the reasoning laid out in the Ninth Circuit’s previous en banc opinion ( Nosal I). The panel focused most of its questions around one main point of contention between the parties: the interpretation of the “without authorization” language appearing throughout Section (a) of the CFAA.

He was also convicted of trade secret misappropriation under the Economic Espionage Act. In 2013, Nosal was found to have violated the CFAA by allegedly conspiring to obtain access to company information belonging to his former employer, executive search firm Korn Ferry, through the borrowing of another employee’s login password. Department of Justice and counsel for David Nosal on Nosal’s criminal conviction arising under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). Margaret McKeown and Stephen Reinhardt heard oral argument from the U.S. On October 20, 2015, a Ninth Circuit panel consisting of Chief Judge Sidney Thomas and Judges M.